I ask the question because I was astonished by how insufficent a New York Times article was today. (Full credit to my girlfriend for noticing the article and bringing it to my attention!) Given its premise -- finding a really good meal while traveling (link works even though Snap Preview doesn't show it) -- I wondered why the paper even bothered to print it. I travel pretty regularly, so I read the article to see if it had any new ideas for me to use. The sources? There are two: 1) The founder of Chowhound.com who, it might surprise you, uses Chowhound.com a lot when he travels. (He even mentions that the site works with the Palm Pilot and neither the reporter nor editor took the time to report that nothing requiring an Internet connection would work on the Palm Pilot, which hasn't been sold in more than five years and never had a live network connection.) 2) The founders of roadfood.com who, it might surprise you (as even the article mentions), use roadfood.com a lot while traveling. The last third of the article lists resources such as Zagat, Fodors, Google Local, and even the Yellow Pages that hotels provide in their rooms. The two main sources I use when I travel? Yelp and Opentable, which are not mentioned. The only question I had when I finished the article was: How long did the reporter take to report this story and were the editors more worried about filling space or providing a real service to readers? This is, after all, supposed to be the pre-eminent news organization in our country.